Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 10, 2014 at 19:01 history edited Alexander Gruber CC BY-SA 3.0
added 4 characters in body
Apr 17, 2013 at 16:57 comment added Lubin Although I was equally surprised when I saw this example, I became less surprised when I realized that it’s just the (completed) semigroup ring over $F$, where the semigroup in question is the set of positive integers under multiplication. If you use the set of nonnegative integers under addition, you get instead $F[[t]]$.
Apr 16, 2013 at 20:32 comment added anon The ring can in fact be described in more familiar terms as $F[[x_2,x_3,x_5,x_7,\cdots]]$ (which can be thought of as the ring of formal Dirichlet series), where the formal variables are indexed by primes. The monomials $\prod x_{p_i}^{e_i}$ correspond to the indicator aka characteristic functions of the singleton sets $\{\prod p_i^{e_i}\}$.
Apr 16, 2013 at 13:16 history edited Alexander Gruber CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 2 characters in body
S Apr 16, 2013 at 12:40 history suggested CommunityBot CC BY-SA 3.0
fix formula display
Apr 16, 2013 at 12:36 review Suggested edits
S Apr 16, 2013 at 12:40
Apr 15, 2013 at 20:10 history edited Alexander Gruber CC BY-SA 3.0
added 199 characters in body
Apr 15, 2013 at 18:28 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by Qiaochu Yuan
Apr 15, 2013 at 15:47 comment added Martin Brandenburg Actually arithmetic functions constitute a ring (with pointwise addition, and Dirichlet convolution as multiplication). Here, $f$ is a unit iff $f(1) \neq 0$ (you should add this to your answer). This is also quite similar (replacing $|$ by $\leq$) to the classification of units in rings of formal power series; only the constant term has to be invertible.
Apr 15, 2013 at 15:37 history edited Alexander Gruber CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Apr 15, 2013 at 15:09 history answered Alexander Gruber CC BY-SA 3.0