Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 23, 2020 at 13:19 comment added Vercassivelaunos If you really have to use coordinates, you should at least use index notation, because otherwise it will be atrocious to read. Then you can write $\mathrm dT_j=\mathrm dx_i\partial_i T_j=\mathrm JT\cdot\mathrm d\vec l$, where $\mathrm JT=(\partial_i T_j)_{ij}$ is the Jacobian. So $\frac{\mathrm d\vec T}{\vert\mathrm d\vec l\vert}=\mathrm JT\cdot \vec e_l$ with $\vec e_l$ the unit vector in direction $\vec l$.
Aug 23, 2020 at 12:36 comment added Elon Tusk How do I do the same for a vector field?
Aug 23, 2020 at 12:36 comment added Elon Tusk I arrived at $\frac {dT}{|d\vec l|} = |\vec \nabla T| \cos\theta$ from the expression: $dT=\frac {\partial T}{\partial x} dx +\frac {\partial T}{\partial y} dy+\frac {\partial T}{\partial z} dz$, which I believe is the total differential. I wrote the same equation as $dT=\biggr{(}\frac {\partial T}{\partial x} e_{x} +\frac {\partial T}{\partial y} e_{y}+\frac {\partial T}{\partial z} e_{z}\biggr{)}.(dx\space e_x+dy\space e_y+dz\space e_z)$ where $e_x,e_y,e_z$ are the unit vectors in the x,y,z directions respectively. This is the same as $dT=\vec \nabla T.d\vec l$
Aug 23, 2020 at 10:52 comment added Vercassivelaunos @enzotib: Thanks for the heads up. Should be better now.
Aug 23, 2020 at 10:50 history undeleted Vercassivelaunos
Aug 23, 2020 at 10:50 history edited Vercassivelaunos CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 659 characters in body
Aug 23, 2020 at 10:43 history deleted Vercassivelaunos via Vote
Aug 23, 2020 at 10:43 comment added Vincenzo Tibullo The question was about the directional derivative of a vector field
Aug 23, 2020 at 10:41 history answered Vercassivelaunos CC BY-SA 4.0