Timeline for Does it make sense to define the inverse of a matrix of functions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2020 at 4:13 | vote | accept | Sin Nombre | ||
| Sep 22, 2020 at 2:07 | answer | added | Ivo Terek | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 22, 2020 at 2:05 | answer | added | gt6989b | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 22, 2020 at 2:03 | comment | added | Dave | You need $\det(A)$ to be invertible, i.e. nonzero in the case of working over a field. In this particular example, you would have $\det(A)$ being a polynomial in $t$ and you want to require that it not vanish. | |
| Sep 22, 2020 at 2:01 | history | asked | Sin Nombre | CC BY-SA 4.0 |