Timeline for Is this explanation of normal subgroups and quotient groups correct?

13 events

when toggle format	what		by	license	comment
Dec 23, 2020 at 4:50	audit	Low quality posts
Dec 23, 2020 at 8:03
Dec 16, 2020 at 1:34	vote	accept	Andrew Li
Dec 11, 2020 at 14:28	comment	added	Steven Gubkin		@AndrewLi Feel free to switch accepted answers if you want: Arturo's answer is better than mine.
Dec 3, 2020 at 20:37	answer	added	Arturo Magidin		timeline score: 4
Dec 3, 2020 at 1:50	vote	accept	Andrew Li
Dec 16, 2020 at 1:34
Dec 3, 2020 at 1:13	answer	added	Steven Gubkin		timeline score: 4
Dec 2, 2020 at 22:26	comment	added	Andrew Li		@ArturoMagidin A good way to look at this (ideally as a precursor to formal definitions, then picking out the places where there's something worth defining such as normality, homomorphisms)
Dec 2, 2020 at 22:24	comment	added	Arturo Magidin		When you say “correct”, do you mean “historically accurate”? Do you mean “accurate as far as it goes”? Do you mean “a valid way to look at things”? Do you mean “a good way to look at this”?
Dec 2, 2020 at 22:21	comment	added	Andrew Li		@Shaun Fixed, I was unaware of the ambiguity. Thanks!
Dec 2, 2020 at 22:20	history	edited	Andrew Li	CC BY-SA 4.0	edited title
Dec 2, 2020 at 22:19	comment	added	Shaun♦		Be careful with the word presentation.
Dec 2, 2020 at 22:18	history	edited	Shaun♦		edited tags
Dec 2, 2020 at 21:02	history	asked	Andrew Li	CC BY-SA 4.0