Timeline for Does every field have a non-trivial Galois extension?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2011 at 9:52 | vote | accept | Pandora | ||
| Sep 29, 2011 at 19:19 | answer | added | Arturo Magidin | timeline score: 22 | |
| Sep 29, 2011 at 19:17 | history | edited | Pandora | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 147 characters in body; edited title |
| Sep 29, 2011 at 19:15 | comment | added | Pandora | @Chris - I only consider algebraic extensions. | |
| Sep 29, 2011 at 19:15 | comment | added | Pandora | @Qiaochu - I meant a field that does have other algebraic extensions. | |
| Sep 29, 2011 at 19:13 | comment | added | Pandora | @Arturo - Yes, of course (maybe I should have been clearer in formulating the question). | |
| Sep 29, 2011 at 19:13 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | If you mean nontrivial Galois extension, no algebraically closed field has one. | |
| Sep 29, 2011 at 19:12 | comment | added | Chris Eagle | What's your definition of "Galois" for an extension that is not algebraic? | |
| Sep 29, 2011 at 19:11 | comment | added | Arturo Magidin | Do you mean, a nontrivial Galois extension? (Every field is Galois over itself) | |
| Sep 29, 2011 at 19:10 | history | asked | Pandora | CC BY-SA 3.0 |