18
$\begingroup$

The book I am using for my Introduction of Topology course is Principles of Topology by Fred H. Croom.

I am to prove the following:

Prove that every connected open $U\subset \mathbb{R}^2$ is path connected.

This is what I understand:

  • A space $X$ is connected provided that it cannot be written as the disjoint union of specifically two open sets.
  • A space $X$ is path connected if given $a,b\in X$, there is a continuous function $f:[0,1]\rightarrow X$ such that $f(0)=a$ and $f(1)=b$

If I am not mistaken, since $U$ is connected then the only sets which are clopen are $\emptyset$ and $U$. Therefore, given any $a\in U$, I would need to show a set of points, say $A\subseteq U$, which can be joined to $a$ by a path in $U$ is clopen.

Rough Proof:

Suppose $U$ is a connected open subset of $\mathbb{R}^2$. Let $a\in U$ and $A\subseteq U$ be a set of points which can join $a$. We define $C=U \setminus A$; therefore, $A\cap C=\emptyset$ by set difference. We seek to prove $A \neq \emptyset$, $A$ is open, and $A$ is closed.

Let $x\in A$ (hence not empty); suppose $\exists \epsilon >0 : B(x,\epsilon)\subseteq U$. Since open balls are convex, it is path connected. Thus for any point $y$ in $B(x)$, there is a path from $x$ to $y$. Since $A$ is a set of points in $U$ that can join $a$, then there exist a path between $x$ and $a$. Since there is a path from $y$ to $x$ and $x$ to $a$; then, there is a path from $y$ to $a$ implying $y$ is in $A$. Since $y\in B(x,\epsilon)$, we conclude $B(x) \subseteq A$, hence $A$ is open.

By definition, for $A$ to be closed, then $U\setminus A = C$ must be open. Using a similar argument above, if $x\in C$, then $\exists \epsilon>0$: $B(x,\epsilon)\subseteq U$. If any point $y\in B(x)$ joins $a$, so can $x$. Hence $C$ is open, therefore $A$ is closed.

By hypothesis, $U$ is connected. Since $A$ is a nonempty subset of $U$, then if follows that $C=\emptyset$ and $A=U$; therefore $U$ is path connected.

Am I on the right track? Is there anything I need to revise or make clear in my proof?


I sincerely thank you for taking the time to read this question and my attempt at proving it. I greatly appreciate any assistance you may provide.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Looks good to me. There are some wording issues ( you say "For $X$ to be true, then $Y$." Then you prove $Y$ and conclude $X$. This is not a logically correct. However, what you meant was " $X$ is equivalent to $Y$" ), but the mathematics is good. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 4, 2015 at 6:01
  • $\begingroup$ When you feel comfortable enough with these examples, check this out: math.stackexchange.com/questions/843173/… $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 4, 2015 at 7:35
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Why A is non empty? You said x is in A but here x is a arbitrary element.not a fixed element.I think it should be 'a' . a is in A and hence A is non empty. $\endgroup$ Commented May 15, 2020 at 3:02
  • $\begingroup$ @LAMDA right?’ That’s what I thought too , we have $a \in A$ not $x$. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 27, 2022 at 3:55

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The above proof is almost correct. The set $C$ should be the set of points that cannot be joined with $a$ by a continuous path within $U$. $C$ is open since every $y\in B_r(x)$ cannot be joined with $a$ for $r>0$ such that $B_r(x)\subset U$. Otherwise, we could join $a$ with $y$ and $y$ with $x$ by linear path so $x$ could be joined with $a$. That is a contradiction.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.