1
$\begingroup$

Suppose $R=\mathbb{Q}[x]$ is a ring and define $T$ to be $T=\{f(x) \in R : f(0) \neq 0\}$

Prove that $\frac{x}{1}$ is the only irreducible element in $T^{-1}R$ (disregarding associates).


My approach: assume $\frac{x}{1}$ is reducible. So there exist non-unit elements $\frac{a}{b}, \frac{c}{d}$ in $T^{-1}R $ such that $\frac{x}{1}=\frac{a}{b} \frac{c}{d}$. So $x=ac$ and since the degree of $x$ is $1$ it follows that the degree of $a$ or $c$ needs to be $0$. So one of the elements $\frac{a}{b}, \frac{c}{d}$ is a unit and therefore our assumption that $\frac{x}{1}$ is reducible can't be true. Is my reasoning thus far correct?

Now I need to show that $\frac{x}{1}$ is the only irreducible element. But how can one prove that?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

0
$\begingroup$

Let $g(x)/h(x)\in T^{-1}R$. Notice that it is irreducible if and only if $g(x)$ is irreducible in $\mathbb Q[x]$, since it is associated to it. There are two cases:

  • $g(0)\neq 0$: in this case $g(x)\in T$ so it is invertible in $T^{-1}R$ and it can't be irreducible.
  • $g(0)=0$: then $g(x)=xg'(x)$ for some $g'(x)\in\mathbb Q[x]$. But if $g'(x)$ were not invertible in $T^{-1}R$, than $g(x)=xg'(x)$ is a non trivial factorization of $g(x)$ (since you already know that $x$ is irreducible). So $g(x)$ is not irreducible.

This proves that if $g(x)$ is irreducible, than it is associated to $x$.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

$T^{-1}R$ is the localization of $R$ at the prime ideal $(x)$, so it is a local ring, moreover it's a PID.

Each irreducible element generates a maximal ideal, and there is only one maximal ideal.

Alternatively, you can go on foot and consider something arbitrarily of the form $\frac{p}{s}$ where $p\in \mathbb Q[x]$. After factoring $p$ completely over $\mathbb Q[x]$, you are left with a product of irreducibles in $\mathbb Q[x]$, and they all have nonzero constant terms except for factors of $x$, if any exist. This means that $p=x^nq$ for some $q$ that is a unit in the localization, and that $\frac{p}{s}=\frac{q}{s}x^n$. This shows that the only irreducible present in any factorization of a nonzero nonunit element is $x$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I don't get why $p=x^nq$ and not $p=x^nq+r$.. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 9, 2016 at 22:18
  • $\begingroup$ Everything that isn't a multiple of $x$ in the factorization becomes a unit in the localization $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 9, 2016 at 23:03

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.