1
$\begingroup$

I want to use the sequential criterion to prove that $f(x) = |x|$ is continuous on $\mathbb R$.

For reference, here is the sequential criterion according to Introduction to Real Analysis by Bartle:

$f:A \rightarrow \mathbb R$ is continuous at the point $c\in A$ if and only if for every sequence $(x_n)$ that converges to $c$, the sequence $(f(x_n))$ converges to $f(c)$.

So my attempt was this: Let $x \in \mathbb R$ and define the sequence $(x_n) = x + \frac{1}{n}$ for $n \in \mathbb N$ so $(x_n)$ converges to $x$. Then $(f(x_n)) = |x_n| = |x + \frac{1}{n}|$ so $(f(x_n))$ converges to $|x|$. Since this is true for all $x \in \mathbb R$, therefore $f(x) = |x|$ is continuous on $\mathbb R$.

My main source of doubt comes from that it seems you can show a lot of functions are continuous simply by slapping on a "$+\frac{1}{n}$". Is this proof valid? Or is there a constraint that I am not meeting?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ you proved it for only one convergent sequence to $c$... but you need to prove that for every sequence $(x_n)$ that converges to $c$ then $(f(x_n))$ converges to $f(c)$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 13, 2017 at 20:37

3 Answers 3

7
$\begingroup$

You're right to doubt that! The sequential criterion you want to apply requires convergence for "every sequence". That's an important word. It's not enough to prove convergence for a sequence of your own choice. You have to prove it for an arbitrary sequence, which might not have any intelligible formula at all. The only thing you can assume about $(x_n)$ is that it converges to $c$. You don't know how fast it converges, or whether it's monotonic, etc.

Also, in this part of your argument:

Then $(f(x_n)) = |x_n| = |x + \frac{1}{n}|$ so $(f(x_n))$ converges to $|x|$.

That "so" is not justified. It would be justified if we already knew that the absolute value is continuous, but you can't assume that; you're trying to prove it!

You can take Opal E's advice on how to start the proof. And by the way, it may be helpful to consider the cases $c>0,c=0,c<0$ separately.

$\endgroup$
5
$\begingroup$

This is not appropriate. Notice that the sequential criterion says that for EVERY sequence that converges to c.

You have only looked at a single sequence, the sequence $x+1/n$.

Instead, you would have to start your proof "Let $(x_n)$ be a sequence that converges to $(c)$. Then, from this, use the definition of sequence convergence to derive that $f(x_n)$ converges to $f(c)$.

Edit: By your approach, the function $f(x) = 0,$ if x is rational and 1, if x is irrational, would be continuous at all rational points! That's a problem, isn't it?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Good answer -- you may want to replace $x_0$ with $c$ for consistency with OP's notation. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 13, 2017 at 20:26
  • $\begingroup$ Good idea -- changed! $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 13, 2017 at 20:28
1
$\begingroup$

You can make this easier if you just split the -function into cases: $|x|=x$ if $ \geq0$ and $|x|=-x $ otherwise. Then for the first case, what you need to show is, essentially, tautological : $ (x_n \rightarrow x ) \rightarrow (x_n \rightarrow x)$ , since $f(x)=x $ in this case. Essentially the same for $f(x)=-x $.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.