2
$\begingroup$

I found the following theorem, but I don't understand it and was unable to prove it. Is it true? Is there a proof for it?

Theorem: Let $f : R^d → R$ be such that $f$ is twice-differentiable and has continuous derivatives in an open ball $B$ around the point $x ∈ R^d$. Then for any small enough $∆x ∈ R^d$ such that $x + ∆x$ is also contained in the ball $B$, we have the following:

$$ f(x + \Delta x) = f(x) + \Delta x^T\nabla f|_x + \frac{1}{2}(\Delta x)^T (\nabla^2f|_w)(\Delta x) $$ Where $(\nabla^2f|_w)$ is the Hessian of $f$ evaluated at a point $w ∈ R^d$ that lies on the line connecting $x$ and $x + ∆x$

I understand that this is a second-order Taylor expansion of $f$ about $x$, and I understand why it is in this form.

But, I don't get is why the Hessian can be evaluated at the point $w$ rather than at $x$. If it is a Taylor expansion about $x$, shouldn't all derivatives be evaluated at $x$? Why is this expansion valid?

For reference, this is where I found the theorem: https://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/fall18/cos597G/lecnotes/lecture3.pdf On page 2.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As mentioned below, this is actually a first order Taylor expansion about the point $x$, with an explicit formula for the remainder term expressed in terms of the second derivative. See for example this answer for a short proof $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 20, 2020 at 13:13

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

The short answer is, that the part with the Hessian of $f$ is an error correcting term. Thus the theorem states that if $f$ is twice differentiable you can approximate your function by an (affine) linear function (your first two terms with zero- and first order differentials) and the error of that approximation evaluated at any point $x+\Delta x$ is given by the Hessian of $f$ evaluated at a certain point on the line between $x$ and $x+\Delta x$.

You will find the same idea in the one-dimensional statement about Taylor series. Sometimes this will be refered to as Lagrangian form (of the remainder).

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! That makes a lot more sense now $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 20, 2020 at 12:53

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.