0
$\begingroup$

Let $f : \Bbb R \longrightarrow [0,\infty)$ be a Borel measurable function. Show that $$\displaystyle{\sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty} \text {m} \left (\left \{f \gt n \right \} \right ) \leq \int f\ \text {dm} \leq \sum\limits_{n = 1}^{\infty} \text {m} \left (\left \{f \geq n \right \} \right ) },$$ where $\text {m}$ denotes the Lebesgue measure.

Approximating $f$ by a non-negative sequence of increasing simple measurable functions I find that $$\begin{align*} \int f\ \text {dm} & = \lim\limits_{n \to \infty} \left [\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{n 2^n - 1} \dfrac {k} {2^n}\ \text {m} \left (\left \{\dfrac {k} {2^n} \leq f \lt \dfrac {k + 1} {2^n} \right \} \right ) + n\ \text {m} \left (\left \{f \geq n \right \} \right ) \right ]. \end{align*}$$

How do I proceed now? Any help will be highly appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

Source $:$ ISI (Indian Statistical Institute) PhD entrance test in Mathematics held in $20$th September this year, TEST CODE $:$ MTA (FORENOON SESSION), Question No. $7.$

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If $0 \leq f <1$ the inequality fails. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 2, 2020 at 8:24
  • $\begingroup$ You are making mess of things by omitting summation over $n$. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 2, 2020 at 8:26
  • $\begingroup$ What does that prove? Does it prove what you are asked to prove? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 2, 2020 at 8:33
  • $\begingroup$ @KaviRamaMurthy yes. For example, I don't see how it holds for $f=1/2$. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 14, 2021 at 11:36
  • $\begingroup$ @mathmather for $f \equiv \frac {1} {2}$ we have $0$ everywhere. Isn't it so? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 15, 2021 at 16:51

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Since $$ \int f\,dm=\int_{0}^{\infty}m(\{f>x\})\,dx=\sum_{n\ge 0}\int_{n}^{n+1}m(\{f>x\})\,dx $$ and $$ m(\{f>n+1\})\le\int_{n}^{n+1}m(\{f>x\})\,dx\le m(\{f>n\}), $$ one gets $$ \sum_{n\ge 1}m(\{f>n\})\le\int_{0}^{\infty}m(\{f>x\})\,dx\le \sum_{n\ge 0}m(\{f>n\}). $$

$\endgroup$
14
  • $\begingroup$ I have checked your arguments for indicator functions. How do I extend it to non-negative simple measurable functions? To show those results for any non-negative measurable function we need to first approximate the function by an increasing sequence of simple measurable function and then apply monotone convergence theorem. But applying it how do I get the result? You should add some more things to it so that it becomes accesible. May I know which book do you follow? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 2, 2020 at 16:00
  • $\begingroup$ \begin{align} \int f\, dm &=\int\left(\int_0^{\infty} 1\{f>x\}\, dx\right)dm \\ &=\int_0^{\infty}\left(\int 1\{f>x\}\, dm\right)dx \\ &=\int_0^{\infty} m(\{f>x\})\, dx \end{align} $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 2, 2020 at 18:02
  • $\begingroup$ What is $1 \left \{f \gt x \right \}\ $? Do you mean $\chi_{\left \{f \gt x \right \}}\ $? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 3, 2020 at 5:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Indeed, it is a typo. Here is the correct result: $$ z=\int_0^z 1\, dx=\int_0^{\infty}\chi_{[0,z]}(x)\,dx=\int_0^{\infty}\chi_{[0,z)}(x)\,dx. $$ $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 3, 2020 at 16:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For $x\in [n, n+1]$, $\{f>n+1\}\subseteq \{f>x\}\subseteq \{f>n\}$. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 3, 2020 at 16:54

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.