3
$\begingroup$

I'm trying to prove any manifold is paracompact, and I'm stuck in the statement marked in red ink. Could anyone tell me how to arrive at this observation? Thank you.

If we add the hypothesis of second-countability to a locally compact Hausdorff space, we can prove even more. A sequence $(K_i)_{i=1}^\infty$ of compact subsets of a topological space $X$ is called an exhaustion of $\boldsymbol{X}$ by compact sets if $X=\bigcup_iU_i$ and $K_i\subseteq\mathrm{Int}\,K_{i+1}$ for each $i$.

Proposition A.60. A second-countable, locally compact Hausdorff space admits an exhaustion by compact sets.

Theorem 1.15 (Manifolds Are Paracompact). Every topological manifold is paracompact. In fact, given a topological manifold $M$, an open cover $\mathscr{X}$ of $M$, and any basis $\mathscr{B}$ for the topology of $M$, there exists a countable, locally finite open refinement of $\mathscr{X}$ consisting of elements of $\mathscr{B}$.

Proof. Given $M$, $\mathscr{X}$, and $\mathscr{B}$ as in the hypothesis of the theorem, let $(K_j)_{j=1}^\infty$ be an exhaustion of $M$ by compact sets (Proposition A.60). For each $j$, let $V_j=K_{j+1}\setminus\mathrm{Int}\,K_j$ and $W_j=\mathrm{Int}\,K_{j+2}\setminus K_{j-1}$ (where we interpret $K_j$ as $\varnothing$ if $j<1$). Then $V_j$ is a compact set contained in the open subset $W_j$. For each $x\in V_j$, there is some $X_x\in\mathscr{X}$ containing $x$, and because $\mathscr{B}$ is a basis, there exists $B_x\in\mathscr{B}$ such that $x\in B_x\subseteq X_x\cap W_j$. The collection of all such sets $B_x$, as $x$ ranges over $V_j$ is an open cover of $V_j$, and thus has a finite subcover. The union of all such finite subcovers as $j$ ranges over the positive integers is a countable open $\color{red}{\text{cover of }M}$ that refines $\mathscr{X}$. Because the finite subcover of $V_j$ consists of sets contained in $W_j$, and $W_j\cap W_{j'}=\varnothing$ except when $j-2\leq j'\leq j+2$, the resulting cover is locally finite. $\qquad\square$

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As a topologist I would just note that $X$ is $\sigma$-compact hence Lindelöf, and it's regular so (strongly) paracompact by general theorems. Why go via the exhaustion? Maybe it's needed for something else later... $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 19, 2021 at 8:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Just as an aside, if you're only interested in manifolds and want to find partitions of unity, the discussion of paracompactness can (I'm not saying should!) be bypassed to some extent. I like the discussion in Bröcker and Jänich's Introduction to differential topoloigy (chapter 7). Given a compact exahaustion, all it takes is to find a nice atlas and cut-off functions for Euclidean balls. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 19, 2021 at 10:52
  • $\begingroup$ Hopefully, I will make it. Math is hard for me. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 20, 2021 at 12:50

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

To see it is a cover, let $x \in M$, and let $j(x) \in \{1,2,3,\ldots\}$ the first $j$ such that $x \in K_j$ (the $K_i$ form a (n increasing) cover of $X$, so this is well-defined). It is then clear that $x \in V_{j(x)-1}$ (note this set is indeed compact as a closed subset of $K_{j(x)}$), by this minimality, so it is going to be in the finite subcover of $B_x$ that are constructed at stage $i=j(x)-1$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.