Timeline for Convert an expression to a Function
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2012 at 13:08 | vote | accept | Simon Woods | ||
| Aug 31, 2012 at 13:05 | comment | added | Simon Woods | @SjoerdC.deVries, good question! Essentially I want to be able to transform an expression to a form which matches the pattern func_[vars__]. I wouldn't be using func by itself (despite the wording of my question, the pure function alone is not the final goal) | |
| Aug 31, 2012 at 2:42 | answer | added | rcollyer | timeline score: 8 | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 21:56 | comment | added | Sjoerd C. de Vries | Just curious: how would you ever going to use the Function if you don't know in which order the variables may end up? I mean, they are sorted alphabetically, so if I swapped x and y the structure of the original function would be the same, but the resulting Function would behave differently. | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 21:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackMma/status/241279679040991232 | ||
| Aug 30, 2012 at 18:49 | answer | added | Brett Champion | timeline score: 8 | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 18:09 | answer | added | rm -rf♦ | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 17:02 | answer | added | Rojo | timeline score: 18 | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 17:01 | answer | added | Heike | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 16:17 | answer | added | Daniel Lichtblau | timeline score: 16 | |
| Aug 30, 2012 at 15:58 | history | asked | Simon Woods | CC BY-SA 3.0 |