Timeline for How to get grid lines at all (log) tick marks in Version 10?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2016 at 13:05 | comment | added | Alexey Popkov | @Mr. I think we should tag this as a bug and add the bug header. | |
| Mar 1, 2016 at 9:42 | vote | accept | Mr.Wizard | ||
| Mar 1, 2016 at 9:42 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | @William I reinstalled 10.0.1 and 10.0.2 just to check this. Neither All nor Full work. I am updating the question post with the aim of directing users to the best solution. | |
| Mar 1, 2016 at 3:52 | comment | added | William | @Mr.Wizard No I do not. I'm amazed that such changes occurred between the versions of 10.0.0 and 10.0.1 although it is a bug. | |
| Mar 1, 2016 at 3:39 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | @William Thank you. I recall trying (guessing) multiple alternative values in 10.0.0 before posting this question, so I probably didn't simply forget to try Full. Do you happen to also have access to v10.0.1? That is when the bug fix necessary for my self-answer solution was made, therefore if Full does not work in 10.0.1 my answer still has value, but if it does it fully supplants my method. | |
| Mar 1, 2016 at 3:32 | comment | added | William | @Mr.Wizard I get A GridLines specification should be None, Automatic, or a list of grid line specifications. M 10.0.0.0 | |
| Mar 1, 2016 at 2:26 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | This works in v10.1.0 as well. Thanks! In version 10.1.0 GridLines -> All also works. I am inclined to think that this may have been a transitory bug. | |
| Feb 29, 2016 at 23:58 | review | Late answers | |||
| Mar 1, 2016 at 0:00 | |||||
| Feb 29, 2016 at 23:32 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 1, 2016 at 0:19 | |||||
| Feb 29, 2016 at 23:32 | history | answered | pmsoltani | CC BY-SA 3.0 |