Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

9
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot again for your kind help. Your method of adding a window really suppressed the multi-peak. But, this window is too small and raw data was partially changed. The bandwidth information is the most important information for me. Is it possible to design a bigger window such that the raw data is changed as few as possible? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 5, 2016 at 4:25
  • $\begingroup$ @user14634 - I think that is specifically not possible. That is, with this data, it is not possible to extract a single frequency and bandwidth. In your post you said you wanted a single peak, and the only way to do that with this data, to my knowledge, is to apply the window and broaden the two peaks such that they merge. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 5, 2016 at 6:59
  • $\begingroup$ @ JasonB, I have already known the center frequency, since I can measure the center frequency in experiment by using other devices, e.g., a spectrometer. What I most want to obtain from this time-domain interference data, is the bandwidth, i.e., the time-domain width and the frequency-domain width (after Fourier transform). $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 5, 2016 at 9:30
  • $\begingroup$ @user14634 and is that center frequency in the center of the two peaks you get above? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 5, 2016 at 9:31
  • $\begingroup$ @ JasonB, Yes, the frequency center should be 0.2124. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 5, 2016 at 9:53