Timeline for Convergence of a multiple numerical integration
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2016 at 15:25 | vote | accept | gypsophila | ||
| Jul 18, 2016 at 12:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMma/status/755009668263665664 | ||
| Jul 17, 2016 at 22:04 | comment | added | Michael E2 | @AntonAntonov Oops, I misread the limits. 0 is not in the T interval, so the integrand is ok (or if not, I haven't discovered the pathological part). | |
| Jul 17, 2016 at 21:56 | comment | added | Anton Antonov | @MichaelE2 Thanks! I thought something like that might be in place... | |
| Jul 17, 2016 at 21:21 | answer | added | Anton Antonov | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 17, 2016 at 21:04 | comment | added | george2079 | what are you trying to accomplish setting WorkingPrecision less than machine precision? In any case if you want to go to high precision you,ll need to specify exact values for your literals ( make 8. 8, etc) | |
| Jul 17, 2016 at 20:37 | comment | added | Anton Antonov | Your working precision is too small. Experiment using higher working precisions and small precision goals. | |
| Jul 17, 2016 at 19:29 | history | edited | gypsophila | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Explain better the form of the function F |
| Jul 17, 2016 at 19:12 | history | edited | Michael E2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Improved formatting |
| Jul 17, 2016 at 18:19 | history | asked | gypsophila | CC BY-SA 3.0 |