Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

4
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Jim. Thanks for your answer. I now used your NonlinearModelFit however I got a different a and b: {a -> 1.70003*10^-6, b -> 1.20435} $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 27, 2017 at 7:03
  • $\begingroup$ And yes, you are right it is not the best fit. I will try to make it better, but what I am looking for is just an asymptotic behaviour of the Fk, thus from the fit I already kind of see what to expect. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 27, 2017 at 7:13
  • $\begingroup$ Using loga as the parameter rather than a in Log[a] gives a number much closer to yours and (maybe more importantly) gives a smaller error variance. However, if your objective is to estimate asymptotic behaviour and you're not so interested in small values of k, then that probably doesn't help much. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 27, 2017 at 17:06
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah I realized that even for getting just an asymptotic behaviour my fit was far too bad, thus I changed the model to ak^(bk^c). Now the fit is much better and the residuals pretty small. Thanks again for your answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 28, 2017 at 7:04