Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

9
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ To be safe, why not provide both the CDF file and the notebook? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 2, 2012 at 15:30
  • $\begingroup$ @J.M. I don't want to overload the supporting information with what would be duplicate information… I have meanwhile had the idea for another possibility (PDF), and thus edited the question. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 2, 2012 at 15:38
  • $\begingroup$ @J.M. A CDF file can be opened in Mathematica and, in my experience, works just like a notebook in that context. What's the advantage of publishing both? I think I'd go with CDF so that anyone can read it. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 2, 2012 at 15:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @F'x You have probably already tried to do as you planned. Could you please give a feedback. Did it work smoothly? Did the journal accept this form of the Supplementing Materials? Where could we have a look at it? Have you some further advises for those who choose to follow this way? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 14, 2013 at 11:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @F'x, so how did it go in the end? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 20, 2014 at 18:59