Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

7
  • $\begingroup$ This is what I get when I run your code. It doesn't seem to be different. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 29, 2017 at 17:26
  • $\begingroup$ @march strange, I just created a new kernel and ran my code there, still the same result. Which Mathematica version do you have? I just added my version to the original post. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 29, 2017 at 17:39
  • $\begingroup$ V10.0.1, Mac OSX. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 29, 2017 at 17:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ By the way, I've removed the bugs tag for now. As mentioned in the bugs tag statement, it is only used when the bug is validated by the community here. It seems like a bug, but let's let the expert community decide. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 29, 2017 at 17:42
  • $\begingroup$ @march With V11.2 on Windows 10 (64bit), I do not reproduce your result. The issue, as I see it, is that ser1 and ser2 are to different orders. If I change the definition of ser1 so that the resulting series is the same order as that in ser2, I obtain the same result. So, I do not think this is a bug. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 29, 2017 at 18:01