Timeline for Series expansion wrong
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2017 at 15:08 | comment | added | Daniel Lichtblau | (2) As best I am aware, @CarlWoll is not actually a wolf. But I should mention I've never seen him during a full moon. | |
| Oct 7, 2017 at 15:06 | comment | added | Daniel Lichtblau | (1) @bgodfrey I added the "bugs" tag, so yes, I regard appearance of such integer powers in the coefficients as a bug. I reported it. Should be fixed for the next release. | |
| Oct 7, 2017 at 0:46 | comment | added | bbgodfrey | @DanielLichtblau When all is said and done, do you judge the behavior here to be a bug? If so, do you or CarlWolf wish to report it, or shall I? Thanks, | |
| Oct 1, 2017 at 15:37 | comment | added | Daniel Lichtblau | The use of fractional powers in 1-x is actually a bug fix (many bug fixes, really). Some of the details, such as integer powers of 1-x appearing in the SeriesData object coefficients, do appear to be amiss. (Maybe you knew this, but I would guess some readers did not.) | |
| Sep 29, 2017 at 22:28 | history | edited | Carl Woll | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 210 characters in body |
| Sep 29, 2017 at 22:13 | history | answered | Carl Woll | CC BY-SA 3.0 |