Skip to main content
Mathematica

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for this. I already have developed almost all of this type of functionality on my own, plus a number of other valuable features (graphical parameter sensitivity analysis, automatic generation of differential rate laws from arbitrary chemical mechanisms where the mechanisms are entered in standard chemistry notation, and several others), and am just asking about the few bits that were missing. So don't take my lack of using your code as dismissal; your work looks great. I just am not looking to reinvent the wheel I've already invented. $\endgroup$ Commented May 11, 2019 at 18:35
  • $\begingroup$ @KevinAusman No problem. I just wanted to show a workflow to the community how Mathematica could be used to generate better initial guesses efficiently and to create a useful JMP like functionality to make minor adjustments to fitted parameters. Also, I was uneasy with the current accepted answer generating unphysical parameter estimates for parameters that should be intrinsically positive. I thought this workflow would be more robust by seeding the fit with better initial parameter estimates. $\endgroup$ Commented May 11, 2019 at 20:01