Timeline for Using a predicate to control the application of a rule in a replacement
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2013 at 9:15 | vote | accept | swish | ||
| Mar 2, 2013 at 18:02 | history | edited | m_goldberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Made English clearer and more idiomatic. |
| Mar 2, 2013 at 16:52 | answer | added | swish | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 2, 2013 at 16:35 | history | edited | swish | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 143 characters in body |
| Mar 2, 2013 at 16:28 | answer | added | Rolf Mertig | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 2, 2013 at 16:26 | history | edited | swish | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 110 characters in body |
| Mar 2, 2013 at 16:11 | comment | added | swish | @Rojo One instance will be sufficient but if it will return every possible valid result that would be awesome. | |
| Mar 2, 2013 at 16:07 | comment | added | Rojo | Or you want "find the x in whatever order and one by one try changing them and checking if the result is valid"? | |
| Mar 2, 2013 at 16:07 | comment | added | Rojo | I don't think this is well specified. For example, what if by turning some subset of the "x" you get the warning but with some others not, how do you decide which changes you want? | |
| Mar 2, 2013 at 15:29 | history | asked | swish | CC BY-SA 3.0 |