Timeline for Destructuring a list containing two items to use it as arguments to a binary function
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2019 at 21:16 | history | edited | mikado | CC BY-SA 4.0 | Modify following comments |
| Dec 9, 2019 at 15:16 | comment | added | Sylvain Leroux | @Lukas, Thank you! I took the liberty of editing the Mikado's answer to quote your comment (I also fixed a small typo in the code where you wrote [1175., 247.] for [{1175., 247.}]. Feel free to revert that edit if you desagree. | |
| Dec 9, 2019 at 15:14 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Dec 9, 2019 at 20:18 | |||||
| Dec 9, 2019 at 10:46 | comment | added | Lukas Lang | It might be worth to add Through[{Mean, Apply@Subtract}[1175., 247.]] as the "inverse" approach (where a list is supplied and converted to a sequence of arguments) | |
| Dec 8, 2019 at 22:02 | vote | accept | Sylvain Leroux | ||
| Dec 8, 2019 at 16:38 | history | edited | mikado | CC BY-SA 4.0 | Additional explanation |
| Dec 8, 2019 at 16:38 | comment | added | Sylvain Leroux | I knew there was some @... notation that would be involved. Thank @mikado. Could you ellaborate a little on the way it works? | |
| Dec 8, 2019 at 16:36 | history | answered | mikado | CC BY-SA 4.0 |