Timeline for Embedding non-orthogonal vectors in a vector space
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2020 at 11:53 | comment | added | user35588 | In the limit $\epsilon \to 0$, yes there won't be any more vectors. However if the dimensionality of the vector space is quite large, then a sufficiently small $\epsilon$ would give rise to many vectors. See the answer by @Roman in which he has demonstrated that the number of such vectors actually grows like an exponential of $\epsilon$. I also have a similar result to that, but I want an explicit demonstration of the same. | |
| Jan 17, 2020 at 14:16 | history | edited | Kagaratsch | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 37 characters in body |
| Jan 16, 2020 at 17:40 | history | edited | Kagaratsch | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 46 characters in body |
| Jan 16, 2020 at 17:38 | comment | added | Kagaratsch | @MikeY Oh, I see what you mean, one can start with a slightly $\mathcal{O}(\epsilon)$ deformed version of $\vec{e}_i$ vectors, but it does not change the argument. I made some edits to accommodate this. | |
| Jan 16, 2020 at 17:35 | history | edited | Kagaratsch | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 233 characters in body |
| Jan 16, 2020 at 16:57 | comment | added | MikeY | I think your statement " the vectors $e⃗_{i}$...must be included in this case as well." is not true, although I agree that the number of vectors is still $n$. | |
| Jan 16, 2020 at 16:37 | history | edited | Kagaratsch | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 279 characters in body |
| Jan 16, 2020 at 16:17 | history | edited | Kagaratsch | CC BY-SA 4.0 | added 207 characters in body |
| Jan 16, 2020 at 16:06 | history | answered | Kagaratsch | CC BY-SA 4.0 |