Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

7
  • $\begingroup$ What if I have 12.0? :) $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 21:40
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @AaronStevens it’s worth the upgrade! Especially for when undocumented functions go documented like in this example! $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 20, 2020 at 22:39
  • $\begingroup$ kglr, the link and linked term are missing a necessary s, I could not edit as it is less than 6 characters $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2020 at 3:07
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you @CATrevillian. I fixed it. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2020 at 3:13
  • $\begingroup$ Is it possible to generate a more efficient version of the function NearestMeshCells[{randMesh, 2}, #] & with NearestMeshCells[{randMesh, 2}]? Typically, this is possible with Nearest-related constructs. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2020 at 8:21