Skip to main content
Mathematica

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

7
  • $\begingroup$ It is probably also good to note that your method is twice as fast :). And your definition will always be scalable, whereas mine has some issues. Oh well $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2013 at 0:48
  • $\begingroup$ +1, good stuff here. I generalized this a bit, see my answer :-). $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2013 at 1:52
  • $\begingroup$ Re: critique - thanks for pointing this out, but not so fast with burying my stuff :) - see the new section in my answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2013 at 15:04
  • $\begingroup$ @Leonid You're welcome, and no burying intended; I expected that you'd have a good response, which as I commented I was looking forward to. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 21, 2013 at 23:20
  • $\begingroup$ Since people tend to look at the plots and tables first, could you also make a new benchmark with my new code, and place that alongside the old one? This would stress the occasional importance of small details even much more. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 22, 2013 at 0:10