Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I don't have a rigorous answer, but it appears that it is linked to the fact f is not defined. If you define f (e.g. f[l___]:=1 the result of NumericQ@f[{1},2,3] become True $\endgroup$ Commented May 14, 2020 at 13:21
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @youyou Isn't it because f evaluates to 1 first? NumericQ doesn't have any Hold* attributes. $\endgroup$ Commented May 14, 2020 at 15:27