Timeline for How to efficiently find positions of duplicates?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2022 at 17:20 | comment | added | bmf | @MichaelE2 many thanks for sharing your thoughts on the matter. I was unsure how many people would've read a comment to an old question, to be honest and quite frankly I was very skeptical with editing Mr.Wizard's answer. I did not know how the other users would respond to something like that. Again, many thanks for your thoughts. I'll take these into advisement for future posts :) | |
| Mar 22, 2022 at 15:25 | comment | added | Michael E2 | No need to delete, and thanks for the work. As the site grows and Mathematica evolves, it's hard to maintain the site. Personally I would've left a comment on Mr.Wizard's answer, so that the answer could be kept up-to-date. It seems better to me than duplicating an answer every time a function is updated. But that's my vision for the site. (Actually I might even have edited his answer and left another update at the bottom, since he hasn't been engaged in the site for a while.) | |
| Mar 22, 2022 at 5:31 | comment | added | bmf | @MichaelE2 if you -or any other user- feel I should delete this answer, I am happy to do so. Just stressing this again. | |
| Mar 22, 2022 at 5:25 | comment | added | bmf | @MichaelE2 yes, I just did not know how to refer precisely to his answer. As I tried to explain this is just a humble status update :) I just thought it might be useful. I happened to check these again today for some projects | |
| Mar 22, 2022 at 5:23 | comment | added | Michael E2 | Mr.Wizard used Values@PositionIndex@a in his answer. Is that what you meant by "it has been mentioned previously"? Is your main point the performance change from V10? | |
| Mar 22, 2022 at 5:08 | history | answered | bmf | CC BY-SA 4.0 |