Timeline for Plotting high precision high degree polynomial
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 2022 at 8:55 | vote | accept | Kvothe | ||
| May 5, 2022 at 1:26 | answer | added | Michael E2 | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 4, 2022 at 21:32 | comment | added | Michael E2 | You're welcome. I've run into the too-narrow plot range before. It's relative. There is probably some heuristic about how many machine FP numbers are in the interval (seems like one way you might get a bad plot with too few numbers, and the way they've chosen, you definitely get a bad plot — makes no sense in that view). I've used the translation trick in cases where I want a figure, and translate the ticks, too, usually with custom labels like $x_1,\;x_2$ etc., since you can't squeeze in enough digits and make it readable. | |
| May 4, 2022 at 20:05 | comment | added | Kvothe | @MichaelE2, thanks for the information. (As far as I can tell the effect due to endpoints being too close to each other is not already described in another question.) | |
| May 4, 2022 at 18:48 | comment | added | Michael E2 | The last has to do with the plot range and the endpoint not being sufficiently distinct (it seems). Compare with it translated: xm = {302662955/69717699, 85724562/19746451} // Mean; Plot[polyRational /. x -> x1 + xm, {x1, Sequence @@ ({302662955/69717699, 85724562/19746451} - xm)}, WorkingPrecision -> 600] | |
| May 4, 2022 at 18:24 | answer | added | Bob Hanlon | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 4, 2022 at 18:21 | comment | added | Michael E2 | Related: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/3152/… | |
| May 4, 2022 at 18:01 | history | asked | Kvothe | CC BY-SA 4.0 |