Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

7
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean, "coherent 3D picture"? Stacking and playing them as a sequence (as you've shown) doesn't seem to be a "coherent 3D picture", any more than other 2D animations. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 3 at 18:17
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidG.Stork I mean visualize as a 3D shape, rather than a 2D animation $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 3 at 18:20
  • $\begingroup$ @DavidG.Stork so for instance in higher resolution here you would expect the 3d version to start with "4 tubes" which eventually merge/split into a different set of 4 tubes $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 3 at 18:21
  • $\begingroup$ I would have thought a "3D picture" is in a static 3D representation (e.g., Graphics3D or Plot3D), so you can grab and rotate it, zoom in, and so on. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 3 at 18:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ One approach might be this: mathematica.stackexchange.com/q/95569/731 $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 3 at 22:26