Timeline for How to parallel this nested table efficiently?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:56 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://mathematica.stackexchange.com/ with https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/ | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 0:59 | vote | accept | matheorem | ||
| Aug 26, 2013 at 15:44 | history | edited | Mr.Wizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 29 characters in body |
| Aug 26, 2013 at 15:40 | history | wiki removed | Mr.Wizard | ||
| Aug 26, 2013 at 15:39 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | @matheorem I'm going to reopen this question based on that statement. | |
| Aug 26, 2013 at 12:19 | comment | added | matheorem | I think my question maybe just a little different to that "Efficient way to utilise Parallel features to make use of many cores". Because in my case, the Method -> "FinestGrained" is essential to guarantee evaluation order. | |
| Aug 26, 2013 at 2:11 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | @matheorem That was just there to simulate the function evaluation taking a variable amount of time. | |
| Aug 26, 2013 at 2:10 | comment | added | matheorem | What does pause do? | |
| Aug 26, 2013 at 1:57 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | @matheorem Answer updated. | |
| Aug 26, 2013 at 1:56 | history | edited | Mr.Wizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 237 characters in body |
| Aug 26, 2013 at 1:47 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | @matheorem Hm... I see. I didn't actually try this before answering; that's always poor. Let me look at this again. | |
| Aug 26, 2013 at 1:39 | comment | added | matheorem | I am afraid that setting "finestGrained" is the same. Try ParallelTable[Labeled[Framed[i, j], $KernelID], {j, 1, 4}, {i, 1, 10}, Method -> "FinestGrained"] | |
| Aug 26, 2013 at 1:22 | history | edited | Mr.Wizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 167 characters in body |
| Aug 26, 2013 at 1:16 | history | answered | Mr.Wizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |