Skip to main content
added 340 characters in body
Source Link
azerbajdzan
  • 32.6k
  • 2
  • 28
  • 76

No need to use coordinates of points just sides are enough.

We do not have to solve for s and ag, we already have formulas for them.

Why I used /. Abs -> Identity? Because in Wolfram they probably do not know that Heron's formula should be without Abs.

Solve provides four solutions, two of them evidently negative.

One of other two solutions is wrong on back substitution for reason unknown to me (without any warning message from Solve). So only the second solution is correct.

Solve[{s == Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]], ag == TriangleMeasurement[ SSSTriangle[a, b, c], {"InteriorAngle", 2}], Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]] == Area[SSSTriangle[d, b, jlcd]] + Area[SSSTriangle[a, c - d, jlcd]]} /. Abs -> Identity, jlcd, {ag, s}] %[[2]] 

enter image description here

Update:

Omitting two unnecessary equations provides correctly output with warning.

Solve[Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]] == Area[SSSTriangle[d, b, jlcd]] + Area[SSSTriangle[a, c - d, jlcd]] /. Abs -> Identity, jlcd] 

enter image description here

No need to use coordinates of points just sides are enough.

We do not have to solve for s and ag, we already have formulas for them.

Why I used /. Abs -> Identity? Because in Wolfram they probably do not know that Heron's formula should be without Abs.

Solve provides four solutions, two of them evidently negative.

One of other two solutions is wrong on back substitution for reason unknown to me (without any warning message from Solve). So only the second solution is correct.

Solve[{s == Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]], ag == TriangleMeasurement[ SSSTriangle[a, b, c], {"InteriorAngle", 2}], Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]] == Area[SSSTriangle[d, b, jlcd]] + Area[SSSTriangle[a, c - d, jlcd]]} /. Abs -> Identity, jlcd, {ag, s}] %[[2]] 

enter image description here

No need to use coordinates of points just sides are enough.

We do not have to solve for s and ag, we already have formulas for them.

Why I used /. Abs -> Identity? Because in Wolfram they probably do not know that Heron's formula should be without Abs.

Solve provides four solutions, two of them evidently negative.

One of other two solutions is wrong on back substitution for reason unknown to me (without any warning message from Solve). So only the second solution is correct.

Solve[{s == Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]], ag == TriangleMeasurement[ SSSTriangle[a, b, c], {"InteriorAngle", 2}], Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]] == Area[SSSTriangle[d, b, jlcd]] + Area[SSSTriangle[a, c - d, jlcd]]} /. Abs -> Identity, jlcd, {ag, s}] %[[2]] 

enter image description here

Update:

Omitting two unnecessary equations provides correctly output with warning.

Solve[Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]] == Area[SSSTriangle[d, b, jlcd]] + Area[SSSTriangle[a, c - d, jlcd]] /. Abs -> Identity, jlcd] 

enter image description here

added 37 characters in body
Source Link
azerbajdzan
  • 32.6k
  • 2
  • 28
  • 76

No need to use coordinates of points just sides are enough.

We do not have to solve for s and ag, we already have formulas for them.

Why I used /. Abs -> Identity? Because in Wolfram they probably do not know that Heron's formula should be without Abs.

Solve provides four solutions, two of them evidently negative so we pick up only other two.

Why there areOne of other two solutions? Because the triangle sides can be ordered is wrong on back substitution for reason unknown to me a, b, c or(without any warning message from b, a, cSolve). So only the second solution is correct.

Solve[{s == Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]], ag == TriangleMeasurement[ SSSTriangle[a, b, c], {"InteriorAngle", 2}], Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]] == Area[SSSTriangle[d, b, jlcd]] + Area[SSSTriangle[a, c - d, jlcd]]} /. Abs -> Identity, jlcd, {ag, s}] %[[{2, 4}]]%[[2]] 

enter image description hereenter image description here

No need to use coordinates of points just sides are enough.

We do not have to solve for s and ag, we already have formulas for them.

Why I used /. Abs -> Identity? Because in Wolfram they probably do not know that Heron's formula should be without Abs.

Solve provides four solutions, two of them evidently negative so we pick up only other two.

Why there are two solutions? Because the triangle sides can be ordered a, b, c or b, a, c.

Solve[{s == Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]], ag == TriangleMeasurement[ SSSTriangle[a, b, c], {"InteriorAngle", 2}], Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]] == Area[SSSTriangle[d, b, jlcd]] + Area[SSSTriangle[a, c - d, jlcd]]} /. Abs -> Identity, jlcd, {ag, s}] %[[{2, 4}]] 

enter image description here

No need to use coordinates of points just sides are enough.

We do not have to solve for s and ag, we already have formulas for them.

Why I used /. Abs -> Identity? Because in Wolfram they probably do not know that Heron's formula should be without Abs.

Solve provides four solutions, two of them evidently negative.

One of other two solutions is wrong on back substitution for reason unknown to me (without any warning message from Solve). So only the second solution is correct.

Solve[{s == Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]], ag == TriangleMeasurement[ SSSTriangle[a, b, c], {"InteriorAngle", 2}], Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]] == Area[SSSTriangle[d, b, jlcd]] + Area[SSSTriangle[a, c - d, jlcd]]} /. Abs -> Identity, jlcd, {ag, s}] %[[2]] 

enter image description here

Rollback to Revision 1
Source Link
azerbajdzan
  • 32.6k
  • 2
  • 28
  • 76

No need to use coordinates of points just sides are enough.

We do not have to solve for s and ag, we already have formulas for them.

Why I used /. Abs -> Identity? Because in Wolfram they probably do not know that Heron's formula should be without Abs.

Solve provides four solutions, two of them evidently negative so we pick up only other two.

Why there are two solutions? Because the triangle sides can be ordered a, b, c or b, a, c.

(*Solve[{s s==Area[SSSTriangle[a== Area[SSSTriangle[a, b,c]]; c]],  ag==TriangleMeasurement[SSSTriangle[a ag == TriangleMeasurement[ SSSTriangle[a, b, c], {"InteriorAngle", 2}];], *)  Solve[Area[SSSTriangle[a Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]] ==   Area[SSSTriangle[d, b, jlcd]] +  Area[SSSTriangle[a, c - d, jlcd]]} /.  Abs -> Identity, jlcd, {ag,  s}] %[[{2, 4}]] 

enter image description here

No need to use coordinates of points just sides are enough.

We do not have to solve for s and ag, we already have formulas for them.

Why I used /. Abs -> Identity? Because in Wolfram they probably do not know that Heron's formula should be without Abs.

Solve provides four solutions, two of them evidently negative so we pick up only other two.

Why there are two solutions? Because the triangle sides can be ordered a, b, c or b, a, c.

(* s==Area[SSSTriangle[a,b,c]]; ag==TriangleMeasurement[SSSTriangle[a,b,c],{"InteriorAngle",2}]; *)  Solve[Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]] == Area[SSSTriangle[d, b, jlcd]] + Area[SSSTriangle[a, c - d, jlcd]] /.  Abs -> Identity, jlcd, {ag, s}] %[[{2, 4}]] 

enter image description here

No need to use coordinates of points just sides are enough.

We do not have to solve for s and ag, we already have formulas for them.

Why I used /. Abs -> Identity? Because in Wolfram they probably do not know that Heron's formula should be without Abs.

Solve provides four solutions, two of them evidently negative so we pick up only other two.

Why there are two solutions? Because the triangle sides can be ordered a, b, c or b, a, c.

Solve[{s == Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]],   ag == TriangleMeasurement[ SSSTriangle[a, b, c], {"InteriorAngle", 2}],  Area[SSSTriangle[a, b, c]] ==   Area[SSSTriangle[d, b, jlcd]] +  Area[SSSTriangle[a, c - d, jlcd]]} /. Abs -> Identity, jlcd, {ag,  s}] %[[{2, 4}]] 

enter image description here

deleted 33 characters in body
Source Link
azerbajdzan
  • 32.6k
  • 2
  • 28
  • 76
Loading
Source Link
azerbajdzan
  • 32.6k
  • 2
  • 28
  • 76
Loading