Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

6
  • $\begingroup$ Unfortunately this doesn't work in M10, I don't quite have enough time to spelunk what's changed but I'll come back if possible soon with a comment - your bio say's your on M9 still $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 21, 2014 at 9:37
  • $\begingroup$ @Martin I'm on v10 now and it still works exactly the same way (though it generates slightly different graphs for the last example due to changes in my Facebook account). Could you please specify where the discrepancy is at your end? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 21, 2014 at 11:34
  • $\begingroup$ I get this i.imgur.com/dLq6XPa.png in a clean kernel, which is slightly odd. $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 21, 2014 at 13:06
  • $\begingroup$ @Martin It seems like something is set prior to plotting with e.g. SetOptions[Graph, ...] or similar. You're missing vertex shapes as well. Is this the result when you start with a fresh kernel? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 21, 2014 at 13:29
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ More complete sub-option list found in v10: {"NewForce","Connectivity","Compatibility","SmoothEdge","Threshold","SpringConstant","CoulombConstant","CoulombDecay","VelocityDamping","LaneWidth"}. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 3, 2015 at 6:22