Timeline for How to make binary image from black holes on white background
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 2014 at 12:43 | comment | added | C. E.♦ | I'm didn't feel happy/content when I read your comment because you make it sound like a matter of opinion. You don't even need ImageDifference, you might as well use e.g. ImageSubtract or ImageMultiply. And you don't even bother to explain why you think ImageDifference is "ideal" for this situation, when in fact it is not even necessary in the solution, which is based on DeleteSmallComponents? | |
| Feb 22, 2014 at 17:47 | vote | accept | user12455 | ||
| Feb 22, 2014 at 0:58 | comment | added | Dr. belisarius | @Pickett Ok, you can keep your key. I'll keep mine and everybody's happy :) | |
| Feb 22, 2014 at 0:47 | comment | added | C. E.♦ | I would argue that the key to this is not ImageDifference but DeleteSmallComponents which acts as kind of inverse top-hat transform. I.E. we need ImageDifference because DeleteSmallComponents does the opposite of what we want. | |
| Feb 22, 2014 at 0:19 | history | undeleted | Dr. belisarius | ||
| Feb 22, 2014 at 0:16 | history | deleted | Dr. belisarius | via Vote | |
| Feb 22, 2014 at 0:16 | history | answered | Dr. belisarius | CC BY-SA 3.0 |