Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • $\begingroup$ Looks great, and that's exactly the output I wanted! I'm wondering whether there's a way to automate this for more complicated regions, though. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 12, 2015 at 19:53
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelLee What exactly do you mean by automating it? You mean join two regions and include the original boundaries in the output, as you originally described the question? (Sorry, I don't know off-hand how to do that.) $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 12, 2015 at 19:54
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, yes, that's what I meant. Ideally, I'd be able to specify two parametric regions that share a boundary, and then create a single mesh from those two regions that includes the boundary. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 12, 2015 at 19:59