Timeline for Defining functions when there are a lot of parameters
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2015 at 0:54 | answer | added | Mr.Wizard | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 26, 2015 at 0:43 | history | edited | Seb | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Removed information that was non-essential to the question. Tried to make it clearer. |
| Feb 26, 2015 at 0:37 | history | edited | Seb | CC BY-SA 3.0 | Removed information that was non-essential to the question. Tried to make it clearer. |
| Feb 26, 2015 at 0:23 | comment | added | Seb | Thanks for the suggestions, and sorry for the confusion. I will try to edit the question. | |
| Feb 26, 2015 at 0:22 | vote | accept | Seb | ||
| Feb 26, 2015 at 0:03 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | This question is confusing. I agree with Albert that it is unlikely that you actually want to do what (he interprets that) you write. Some questions that may be related to your goal: (6588), (15749), (26686), (52057), (55833) | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 23:25 | comment | added | Basheer Algohi | If delta and gamma are treated each as one unit in g then you simply use f[x_, y_] := g[Sequence @@ x, Sequence @@ y] | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 23:15 | answer | added | Albert Retey | timeline score: 3 | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 22:46 | comment | added | Albert Retey | while one can do what you describe I hardly can believe it really is what you want. Doesn't Davids answer do exactly what you want? You probably should describe more clearly what your ultimate goal is... | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 22:32 | answer | added | David G. Stork | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 25, 2015 at 22:10 | history | asked | Seb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |