Timeline for Mathematica does not distribute conjugation when used with Assuming sometimes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2015 at 16:53 | answer | added | bbgodfrey | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 9, 2015 at 10:29 | history | edited | J. M.'s missing motivation | edited tags | |
| Aug 8, 2015 at 20:10 | comment | added | Sjoerd C. de Vries | As far as I know, you can't use patterns in assumptions. You have to provide all individual cases. | |
| Aug 8, 2015 at 19:48 | history | rollback | MarcoB | Rollback to Revision 1 | |
| Aug 8, 2015 at 19:47 | comment | added | MarcoB | Ok, I rolled back my edit to your initial version. Please register on the site so you will be able to accrue reputation, comment, vote up answers etc. Once you do, if you still have no control of your question, you ca use the following procedure to merge the accounts: mathematica.stackexchange.com/help/merging-accounts | |
| Aug 8, 2015 at 19:42 | comment | added | user32275 | I asked as a guest so I cannot edit. I used latex to demonstrate the idea, then a moderator changed it into mathematica format for some reason. I use E and I for the natural and imaginary numbers, and have the correct syntax for mathematica, which now is not the case above. | |
| Aug 8, 2015 at 19:32 | comment | added | Sjoerd C. de Vries | Also, note that e is just an undefined symbol. If you're looking for Euler's number: that's E in Mathematica. | |
| Aug 8, 2015 at 19:29 | comment | added | MarcoB | Please don't use a mixture of LaTeX and Mathematica expressions. | |
| Aug 8, 2015 at 19:28 | history | edited | MarcoB | CC BY-SA 3.0 | added 16 characters in body |
| Aug 8, 2015 at 19:27 | review | First posts | |||
| Aug 8, 2015 at 19:32 | |||||
| Aug 8, 2015 at 19:17 | history | asked | user32273 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |