Skip to main content
replaced http://mathematica.stackexchange.com/ with https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

In the course of improving my answer to 9536195361, I noticed that the DSolve documentation on the web is much better written than that distributed with Mathematica 10.2.0 for Microsoft Windows (64-bit) (July 7, 2015). Moreover, it describes a more powerful version of DSolve, one that accepts Assumptions as an option and can solve Sturm-Liouvlle Problems, for instance. My questions are

  • Are this better version of DSolve and its documentation available for download?
  • Do other functions have updated versions and documentation not part of the current release of Mathematica?
  • Does documentation exist for DSolve Method?

In the course of improving my answer to 95361, I noticed that the DSolve documentation on the web is much better written than that distributed with Mathematica 10.2.0 for Microsoft Windows (64-bit) (July 7, 2015). Moreover, it describes a more powerful version of DSolve, one that accepts Assumptions as an option and can solve Sturm-Liouvlle Problems, for instance. My questions are

  • Are this better version of DSolve and its documentation available for download?
  • Do other functions have updated versions and documentation not part of the current release of Mathematica?
  • Does documentation exist for DSolve Method?

In the course of improving my answer to 95361, I noticed that the DSolve documentation on the web is much better written than that distributed with Mathematica 10.2.0 for Microsoft Windows (64-bit) (July 7, 2015). Moreover, it describes a more powerful version of DSolve, one that accepts Assumptions as an option and can solve Sturm-Liouvlle Problems, for instance. My questions are

  • Are this better version of DSolve and its documentation available for download?
  • Do other functions have updated versions and documentation not part of the current release of Mathematica?
  • Does documentation exist for DSolve Method?
Tweeted twitter.com/StackMma/status/650442755714457601
added 2 characters in body; edited tags
Source Link
Karsten7
  • 27.7k
  • 5
  • 76
  • 138

In the course of improving my answer to 95361, I noticed that the DSolve documentation on the web is much better written than that distributed with MathematicaMathematica 10.2.0 for Microsoft Windows (64-bit) (July 7, 2015). Moreover, it describes a more powerful version of DSolve, one that accepts Assumptions as an option and can solve Sturm-Liouvlle Problems, for instance. My questions are

  • Are this better version of DSolve and its documentation available for download?
  • Do other functions have updated versions and documentation not part of the current release of Mathematica?
  • Does documentation exist for DSolve Method?

In the course of improving my answer to 95361, I noticed that the DSolve documentation on the web is much better written than that distributed with Mathematica 10.2.0 for Microsoft Windows (64-bit) (July 7, 2015). Moreover, it describes a more powerful version of DSolve, one that accepts Assumptions as an option and can solve Sturm-Liouvlle Problems, for instance. My questions are

  • Are this better version of DSolve and its documentation available for download?
  • Do other functions have updated versions and documentation not part of the current release of Mathematica?
  • Does documentation exist for DSolve Method?

In the course of improving my answer to 95361, I noticed that the DSolve documentation on the web is much better written than that distributed with Mathematica 10.2.0 for Microsoft Windows (64-bit) (July 7, 2015). Moreover, it describes a more powerful version of DSolve, one that accepts Assumptions as an option and can solve Sturm-Liouvlle Problems, for instance. My questions are

  • Are this better version of DSolve and its documentation available for download?
  • Do other functions have updated versions and documentation not part of the current release of Mathematica?
  • Does documentation exist for DSolve Method?
added 1 character in body
Source Link
Oleksandr R.
  • 23.2k
  • 4
  • 88
  • 129

In the course of improving my answer to 95361, I noticed that the NDSolveDSolve documentation on the web is much better written than that distributed with Mathematica 10.2.0 for Microsoft Windows (64-bit) (July 7, 2015). Moreover, it describes a more powerful version of DSolve, one that accepts Assumptions as an option and can solve Sturm-Liouvlle Problems, for instance. My questions are

  • Are this better version of DSolve and its documentation available for download?
  • Do other functions have updated versions and documentation not part of the current release of Mathematica?
  • Does documentation exist for DSolve Method?

In the course of improving my answer to 95361, I noticed that the NDSolve documentation on the web is much better written than that distributed with Mathematica 10.2.0 for Microsoft Windows (64-bit) (July 7, 2015). Moreover, it describes a more powerful version of DSolve, one that accepts Assumptions as an option and can solve Sturm-Liouvlle Problems, for instance. My questions are

  • Are this better version of DSolve and its documentation available for download?
  • Do other functions have updated versions and documentation not part of the current release of Mathematica?
  • Does documentation exist for DSolve Method?

In the course of improving my answer to 95361, I noticed that the DSolve documentation on the web is much better written than that distributed with Mathematica 10.2.0 for Microsoft Windows (64-bit) (July 7, 2015). Moreover, it describes a more powerful version of DSolve, one that accepts Assumptions as an option and can solve Sturm-Liouvlle Problems, for instance. My questions are

  • Are this better version of DSolve and its documentation available for download?
  • Do other functions have updated versions and documentation not part of the current release of Mathematica?
  • Does documentation exist for DSolve Method?
Source Link
bbgodfrey
  • 63k
  • 18
  • 94
  • 169
Loading