Skip to main content
Meta Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

12
  • Can you post a link to the original question? Commented Sep 7, 2011 at 21:36
  • @squillman: stackoverflow.com/questions/5031910/… here you go Commented Sep 7, 2011 at 21:38
  • Related: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/96950/… Commented Sep 7, 2011 at 21:39
  • I've had this a few times as well. But hey, mods are humans. Related: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/105391/… Commented Sep 7, 2011 at 21:40
  • @Billy : when I flag something, I don't really wanna have to go back for each flag hoping they haven't updated anything, so I do not have to reevaluate my flags over and over again Commented Sep 7, 2011 at 21:47
  • Jaanus: That's why I said "related", not "duplicate" :) Commented Sep 7, 2011 at 21:50
  • You may want to comment with a "hey you forgot something or the post got mangled" rather than flagging in these cases. Commented Sep 7, 2011 at 22:04
  • Or, if it's a question about HTML (or any other language that uses <>) and it looks like the poster simply omitted the code, you can click the edit button and see if it's actually there but hidden. Commented Sep 7, 2011 at 22:21
  • If you were a bit more seasoned, you'd have realized that the poster screwed up his code formatting. You then would have edited to fix. That would be the proper action to take here. Commented Sep 8, 2011 at 13:33
  • @Won't proper action would not be posting pictures of you eating worms Commented Sep 8, 2011 at 13:35
  • @Jaanus: Mmmm, worms. With piss. Commented Sep 8, 2011 at 14:18
  • @Won't damn, better drink my own piss Commented Sep 8, 2011 at 14:26