Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • 1
    +1. Some of the comments on those W3Schools links are pretty funny :) Commented Jan 23, 2012 at 17:06
  • 1
    Also stackoverflow.com/questions/5045352/… (and my answer's revisions) Commented Jan 23, 2012 at 17:11
  • +1 for using science. I note the bad ones seem to always be related to their javascript advice...is that particularly bad? I've never had trouble with their HTML tag info, even for HTML5 stuff. Commented Jan 23, 2012 at 17:16
  • @BenBrocka: Yes, their JavaScript advice is particularly bad. They don't use semicolons, for example. I think the problems in the tag references are limited to wrong attribute lists and browser compatibility. See w3fools.com. Commented Jan 23, 2012 at 17:23
  • @BenBrocka: Actually, I think it might be the tutorials that are problematic. Commented Jan 23, 2012 at 17:25