Timeline for Decision on rejected edits should be made more prominent to editors
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2012 at 13:52 | comment | added | BoltClock's a Unicorn Mod | Uh, flags are a whole different matter altogether. Users need to know what we moderators tell them about their flags, I'd even say more so than what the community tells them about their edit suggestions. | |
| Feb 8, 2012 at 12:49 | comment | added | MarkJ | But the hordes of people can be asked to make their suggestions in other meta questions. Then the bad suggestions (useless notification ideas) can be downvoted with an explanation like this and won't be implemented. | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 21:53 | comment | added | slhck | Of course you have a point. I've always liked the fact that you don't get notifications for everything, but an edit being rejected just vanishes somewhere in the profile. It's not like you could even easily research this yourself. Users that suggest invalid and harmful edits will never receive any feedback about how "bad" they acted. The other cases you mention are always "positive" notifications (except for a "broken SO account", I don't know what you mean by that). | |
| Feb 7, 2012 at 21:36 | history | answered | Andonuts | CC BY-SA 3.0 |