Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

7
  • 1
    Getting rid of the dupes and having them redirect automatically also removes the alternate wording. Commented Aug 22, 2009 at 4:32
  • 2
    @random: wouldn't have to. A timed meta redirect could display the old page for a moment, or the destination could be informed of the source and display the alternate wording as a "redirect from", Wikipedia-style... Commented Aug 22, 2009 at 4:48
  • Does Google like the meta-redirects? Would it penalise the site if it was put in? Commented Aug 22, 2009 at 5:00
  • @Shog9 if your time is that valuable, what are you doing here? ;-) Commented Jan 13, 2010 at 19:30
  • This is one of those time-consuming, ultimately pointless things. Commented Jan 13, 2010 at 23:23
  • no timed meta-redirects please! Commented Sep 7, 2010 at 18:46
  • I partially agree with you, but I'd like to know that the question has been merged (rather than just bam! be redirected automagically) Commented Sep 30, 2011 at 15:38