Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • I've purged the comments here to make room for further discussion. Be forewarned: I will delete without reply any comment that alleges the existence of a problem without a link to an instance of it. Have a nice day! Commented Jan 7, 2014 at 22:18
  • 7
    Here is a case where a down-vote is locked in because the user corrected their mistake within the grace period. Their original code was wrong, they corrected it, but the down-voter didn't notice the correction until grace expired. (There were two other down-voters who did catch it within the grace period; I was one of them.) The answerer could make some other, superfluous edit now to resolve this, and then notify the down-voter that they can now change their vote, but if their original post was an official revision, they wouldn't have to do that. Commented Jan 15, 2014 at 19:46
  • Add a link to this report from your question, @Aaron. Since I've already answered that, I'm not going to address it here. Commented Jan 15, 2014 at 20:36
  • 2
    Come on Shog, that feature request is nothing at all like mine. Could you enlighten me with the exact search term I should have used to go find that first, and why I should have even done so when the link I posted above - which is exactly the kind of thing I thought you were interested in knowing about, in the context of this feature request - happened to me first-hand? Commented Jan 15, 2014 at 21:06
  • Extremely weary of the OT comments; I'll drop into chat and you can get it out of your system there. Commented Jan 15, 2014 at 21:08