Timeline for How can we make First Posts review actually useful?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/ | |
| Jun 18, 2014 at 9:49 | comment | added | user56reinstatemonica8 | +1 I think many of the regulars have been on SE so long they've forgotten that the rest of internet doesn't work like SE does. StackOverflow is an exception because it's so absurdly massive in its industry (it IS now the standard for how the internet works for programming questions), but for every other site, people need to learn somehow. | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 19:00 | comment | added | Elder Geek | I agree that "the purpose of the first posts review list in "Help them learn to use the site." I received plenty of valuable guidance on askubuntu.com. I like to think that resulted in my becoming a valuable member of the team. Without that guidance I would have likely found another way to be useful elsewhere. | |
| Jun 17, 2014 at 16:20 | history | answered | NoDataDumpNoContribution | CC BY-SA 3.0 |