Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • I might actually be confused about how the two queues work, so I've requested some clarification in the question... Commented Jul 15, 2014 at 13:51
  • There's definitely potential in expanding the range of post and user scores that are allowed in - but only if the resulting volume isn't overwhelming. Again, the current system results in a majority of posts that get no action whatsoever (even on RPG) - no votes, no edits, no comments... Past experience tells us that any one of these is more encouraging to a new user than crickets - yes, it'd be nice if folks could take each new user by the hand and have a good little chat, but that can often be too much to ask - so let's not let the perfect be the enemy of the good here. Commented Jul 15, 2014 at 15:02
  • It just came to mind to mention: personally, most of my NAN actions happen on answers I don't have the experience to judge. I can edit a poorly written answer, or flag an abusive one, but a lot of answers are about games or features I have no particular expertise or knowledge around. Voting on those will happen outside New Posts queue, and as long as nothing's obviously wrong, I'll likely hit NAN or skip. Commented Jul 16, 2014 at 8:07