Timeline for Query view counts give incorrect results
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2023 at 8:35 | answer | added | user152859 | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 23, 2017 at 12:36 | history | edited | CommunityBot | replaced http://stackoverflow.com/ with https://stackoverflow.com/ | |
| Feb 8, 2016 at 12:37 | comment | added | rene Mod | Maybe it is easier to fix your real-life interruptions... | |
| Feb 8, 2016 at 9:00 | comment | added | Adam Lear StaffMod | @ShadowWizard Not sure I agree. It's still broadly useful at larger magnitudes. | |
| Feb 8, 2016 at 8:51 | comment | added | user152859 | @Adam while I tend to agree, I think this renders the whole "search by views" operator useless. If it can't be precise, better just remove it. | |
| Feb 8, 2016 at 4:39 | history | edited | Adam LearStaffMod | edited tags | |
| Feb 8, 2016 at 4:39 | comment | added | Adam Lear StaffMod | We don't re-index questions for search when only views change. Searching by views isn't terribly precise as a result. Not in a position to verify at the moment, but my money's on [status-bydesign] here. | |
| Feb 8, 2016 at 4:11 | history | asked | Mogsdad | CC BY-SA 3.0 |