Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • 10
    It affects your ability to access the site, so no, it's not just SE's problem. It affects everyone who would like to use the site. Yes, that would affect SE as a company, but it wouldn't just affect them. Commented Jun 30, 2017 at 18:04
  • @Servy what is SE's problem? Commented Jul 2, 2017 at 18:50
  • @PeterDavidCarter The negative effects of losing net neutrality in the US. Commented Jul 5, 2017 at 13:12
  • 5
    This directly affects the entire SE network if implemented so you don't get to hide behind the "please no politix" flag on this one. There are times you have to have an opinion on what's going on outside your window and this is one of those times. SE are also free to use the SE network for whatever they see fit, including protecting their own business and livelihood. Commented Jul 12, 2017 at 5:02
  • 1
    @ivarni the issue here is that not everybody agrees with your statement. There are those who think net neutrality is bad, is a stalking horse for regulation of internet content, or just a ploy to benefit one set of giant powerful corporations (google etc) against another set of corporations who are smaller and less powerful (ISPs). Question is not who is right but whether you want to alienate those users who disagree by having the site take sides.. Commented Jul 12, 2017 at 12:15