Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

7
  • 14
    "We want to explore leveraging existing community decision making processes (mods, meta etc) to empower individual Stack Exchange sites to determine their own look and feel, rather than a top-down approach." makes me more hopeful about this go-round. I hope to see more community control over things that have in the past been mandated by the company. Commented Jun 2 at 20:23
  • 19
    On MathJaX specifically - on TeX-sx we actively don't want it enabled, so a network-wide activation would be not just a hit in load time but in functionality! Commented Jun 3 at 8:34
  • 3
    I want the mothership back as an ask question button!!! Commented Jun 4 at 0:17
  • 4
    @ColleenV Me, on the contrary. It turns my buzzword Geiger counter into a white noise generator. Commented Jun 4 at 12:12
  • 2
    @user3840170 This is a staff posting in their official capacity and the company's relationship to the community is still quite volatile. They need to be formal to try to avoid triggering people. I am still encouraged that they recognize that a top-down approach might not be the best choice. Commented Jun 4 at 13:33
  • 3
    Exactly. For example, the "TeX" community has a few high-powered deverlopers, a few more low-powered responders, and a large number of new or rare users. This is because the nature of TeX is its usage for writing mathematics-intensive publications, and there are not many folks who do that repeatedly. Many users will only do it once, for a dissertation. I expect that it is quite the opposite for sites with more versatile programming languages, or other general information. Commented Jun 4 at 21:44
  • 4
    Philippe, at least, has always been very clear about recognizing the platform's variety of communities and attempts to avoid lumping them all into an aggregate. Commented Jun 5 at 7:53