Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • 2
    Thank you for sharing so much detail. We're actively working on our search relevance to retrieve SO & SE content more reliably, evaluating models to get the most accurate responses, and updating workflow to ask the user for clarification instead of trying to answer everything. Commented Sep 22 at 13:44
  • 1
    I honestly dont think your time would be well-spent trying to directly answer any aspect of my post. If this potentially adds some information that could help improve attribution in some small way that would be time well spent. Commented Sep 22 at 20:06
  • 1
    @AshZade Update: I made an edit above. Having done a separate test on Q2 with a larger sigma, I am more confident that it likely took information specifically about 4 from an answer of mine (its a value I have mentioned a few times; in any case it should say where it got it; and you should also be worried it doesn't say anything when the problem is worse). Commented Sep 22 at 20:21