Skip to main content
Meta Stack Exchange

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

7
  • good feedback -- can you provide more detail, examples or screenshot of this? Commented Mar 31, 2010 at 2:21
  • 1
    Don't forget free hand circles (red)! Commented Mar 31, 2010 at 2:53
  • @Jeff: I added much more detail for you Commented Mar 31, 2010 at 8:47
  • @case excellent, that helps! Commented Mar 31, 2010 at 9:29
  • w/r/t linking posts see blog.stackoverflow.com/2010/04/new-linked-posts Commented Apr 26, 2010 at 6:36
  • @Jeff: Nice solution Commented Apr 28, 2010 at 0:08
  • 1
    @Jeff not sure the "Linked" sidebar solves the same problem. The biggest impact of the follow-up questions, as this answer says, is social. The concept of a "follow-up" question is technically the same as linking, but semantically different. It implies a much stronger connection between the two. The follow-up is about the original question or one of its answers, not just something that someone happened to mention somewhere. And the sense of a link is highlighted (on the Linked sidebar they're bidirectional), which gives you the timeline of the conversation. Commented Jun 7, 2010 at 17:09