Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

8
  • Agree with that; haven't we been mentioning that since the dark days of uservoice? (mention @Jeff just for the notification) Commented Mar 31, 2010 at 9:48
  • 13
    I like #4 - allow low-rep users to merely suggest an edit that must then be approved by the op. Commented Apr 6, 2010 at 19:28
  • I would like to hear more about your proposal for #1, with some very specific .. specifics. Commented Apr 25, 2010 at 10:19
  • @Jeff: Well, by "in that area" I did mean "editing", not "the site / topic as a whole". I think the CW system recognizes that there is a place for low-rep edits, but forces an all-or-none approach to enabling it. Anyway, I expanded #1 a bit; if you want more detail I can post something in the feature request Commented Apr 25, 2010 at 22:38
  • @shog9 the feature request is extremely.. threadbare.. and needs a lot more information. Commented Apr 26, 2010 at 1:38
  • I like new users to be able to edit, with the auther or someone else aproving the edit. We now have lots of new users on some sites that have used other SE sites for a long time. Commented Aug 24, 2010 at 7:53
  • 3
    #4 has been implemented. Commented Oct 1, 2011 at 17:38
  • 3
    ...and #1, and #2, and #3 Commented May 31, 2012 at 21:23